Patient Care and Implicit Biases

Suppose you have ever attempted the Harvard Implicit Association Test (IAT). In that case, you will realize it shows implicit biases or an unexpected inclination towards a particular category of interest that may often contradict your beliefs or expectations. Nevertheless, the IAT emerged as a valuable instrument for unearthing unconscious biases that may not align with our convictions.

Navigating through professional responsibilities laden with ethical considerations, I have always been vigilant about addressing both conscious and unconscious biases. However, the IAT underscored the intricate nature of these biases, penetrating even the subconscious layers of our attitudes. Implicit attitudes towards race/ethnicity, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation, national origin, veteran status, obesity, addiction, and homelessness can significantly influence clinical judgment. The intricacies and limitations in understanding these multifaceted factors often contribute to these biases, highlighting the need for continued introspection.

In healthcare, where the stakes are high, and patient well-being is paramount, acknowledging the influence of implicit biases becomes a critical aspect of delivering equitable and patient-centered care. Understanding that these biases impact clinical judgment necessitates a nuanced approach to patient interactions. It calls for recognizing patients’ diverse backgrounds, experiences, and identities in healthcare.


The path forward lies in fostering a healthcare environment where patients are treated as care recipients and active contributors to their well-being. Contextualizing care, active listening, and involving patients in decision-making become indispensable practices in mitigating the impact of implicit biases. Education emerges as a key catalyst for change, equipping healthcare professionals with the knowledge and awareness needed to navigate the complex landscape of human diversity.

As we strive for positive health outcomes, we must view patient care as a collaborative effort, transcending the boundaries of bias. The journey toward unbiased healthcare is ongoing, requiring commitment, self-reflection, and a collective dedication to dismantling ingrained prejudices. By embracing this ethos, we can pave the way for a healthcare system that not only recognizes the existence of implicit biases but actively works towards mitigating their impact to improve patient well-being.

You can take the Harvard Implicit Association Test here.

Nurturing Equality in the Face of Forgetfulness: Health Equity and Alzheimer’s Disease

Health Inequalities arise when barriers hinder individuals and communities from accessing optimal conditions for reaching their full potential. It distinguishes inequities from health disparities, which are differences in health status linked to social or demographic factors. Health Equity involves valuing everyone equally, optimizing conditions across various life stages, and collaborating with different sectors to address factors influencing health, such as employment, housing, education, healthcare, public safety, and food access. Notably, the passage acknowledges racism as a factor influencing the distribution of these social determinants.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), addressing disparities necessitates national leadership to involve diverse stakeholders, coordinate federal entities and nonfederal partners, advocate for effective policies, and ensure accountability. The CDC and its collaborators can utilize the report’s findings to heighten awareness of vulnerable groups. Additionally, the insights can motivate increased interventions at state, tribal, and local levels to tackle health disparities and inequalities effectively.

Also, Healthy People 2030 offers diverse strategies for attaining health equity. A pivotal aspect in realizing the overarching vision of enhancing the health and well-being of all is the targeted addressing of health disparities. Consequently, disparity ratios are being formulated to evaluate data on disparities for population-based core objectives, utilizing demographic group data available at a specific time point.

In Alzheimer’s disease, achieving health equity gains significant importance. Factors such as income, education, and access to health care can create disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and support services. We address all disparities so that patients and caregivers have equal opportunities for early detection, quality care, and support services regardless of their background. This approach is crucial for creating an inclusive society where everyone can age with dignity and receive the necessary assistance in managing the challenges posed by Alzheimer’s disease.

https://www.apha.org/Topics-and-Issues/Health-Equity
https://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/CHDIReport.html
https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/about-disparities-data
https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/resources/understanding-health-disparities/health-equity.html